Standard Life fined £2.45m for misleading pensions customers (Jan 2010)

- by Kelly Richards
standard life fined by FSA - Cashflaot

FCA Regulation of the UK Financial Sector

The financial services industry in the UK can be seen as heavily regulated. The FCA and PRA were subject to reform when the FSA was found not to be handling cases as well as it should have been doing. As such, reformation was deemed as essential.

Any financial industry in the UK has to be seen as operating in a fair and integral way. For example, regulation of the payday loan industry recently transformed majorly in an attempt to make it more honest and transparent. They should be considered as promoting stability within the UK and its economy. As a result, there needs to be regulation on how these bodies conduct themselves in the public eye. If they are not acting in a responsible way, they can be investigated and ultimately fined. Of course, there are some companies that are honest and trustworthy. But, there have been many cases where companies and insurance providers have not provided their customers with valid information.

UK Pensions and Investment Regulation

Any customer has the right to true and accurate information when they are purchasing an investment product. A product like a pension plan is a good example of an investment product. When a consumer takes out a pension scheme, they need to ensure that they are in receipt of how their investment will see a return on investment. But, they also need to be armed with all of the facts about a company. Many pension investment companies have honest information to give to their clientele. But, not all businesses have followed suit.

One company, in particular, Standard Life, was subject to investigation after it was found to be misleading its pensions customers. Let’s take a look at this case study in more depth.

The Case of Standard Life: Misinforming and Misleading Its Customers

standard life fined by FSA - Cashflaot

January 2010 proved to be a difficult time for Standard Life. Following the investigation conducted by the FSA, the company was subject to a £2.45 million penalty. The FSA found that the pension provider was misleading consumers when it came to issues around cash funds.

Standard Life informed customers that the pension plan was a low-risk investment. What’s more, they claimed that this investment was suitable for those of retirement age. It was deemed as a good way to boost their income when it came to ending their working life, and they no longer had a regular wage day advance. Systematic errors and controls within their marketing content meant that many customers were misled. They were misled into investing into a high-risk investment that saw fit to lose a substantial amount of cash.

The fund itself was worth over £2 billion. But, only 12% of this money was invested in cash. The remainder of the money was held in self-cert and buy to let mortgages. These are not considered as low-risk investments. In fact, they are deemed as quite the opposite. As a result of this misinformation, investors had lost a lot of their investments capital.

Following the investigation, Standard Life refused to give their investors compensation. But, following the backlash that it received from this, they agreed to restore investor’s losses.

FSA Investigation: Lack of Controls and Systems

The FSA found numerous problems with Standard Life. They had failed to implement the right protocols, controls and systems. They had sent out inappropriate marketing material. This ultimately misleads the consumer into investing in a high-risk product. The content that was published for consumers did not depict fair and honest representations of how the cash would be invested.

Misleading information is a serious breach of consumer trust. What’s more, this is a financial crime. Any marketing material that is given to consumers has to be honest and upfront about the promotion that it is advertising. If it is not, the FSA can step in and ensure that consumers are remunerated for their losses.

Customers, by law, have to be in receipt of accurate information. If they still choose to invest in a high-risk product, that is down to have the right information. But, if they are not given an accurate portrayal of how their money will be used, they are not able to make an informed decision. Every individual will have different needs when it comes to investment strategies. Standard Life failed to recognise this.

Insurers have to ensure that they are giving customers the right information. This is especially true when it comes to investment products. Standard Life was fined £2.45 million as a result of their unorthodox marketing material. As a consequence of this, it was thought that all pension investment firms should have sufficient material within their companies. This is to ensure that their investors are given accurate depictions of their cash and where it would be held.

The FSA’s Approach to Dealing with Misinformation

The FSA has come under scrutiny for, not having a more robust approach to tackling this kind of financial crime. In the main, many people feel that the FSA is a light touch and does not distribute significant fines. But, in the case of Standard Life, the FSA dealt a hefty fine. What’s more, they made sure that those who were in receipt of this product were financially compensated

How Can the FSA Prevent Misconduct?

In the case of Standard Life, the FSA could have adopted a more strategic approach to those who failed to operate within the preferred guidelines. The fines, while substantial, do not seem to act as a deterrent within the financial services industry. There needs to be more personal accountability within corporations. This is to ensure that these misconducts are not in place again. In this particular case, the FSA could have held the marketing managers and distributors accountable for misinformation.

While the FCA and PRA are keen to distribute large fines, there needs to be more done to prevent customers suffering severe financial losses. The FCA needs to work wholly with businesses and governments to ensure that these issues are not a matter of reactive investigations. The FCA is keen to introduce new and improved guidelines to ensure that all customer complaints are handled fairly. In the crux of it all, the FCA needs to take proactive measures. By doing this, they can work in conjunction with businesses to ensure that consumers get a fairer deal all around.

About The Author
Kelly Richards
Kelly Richards is the founder of the Cashfloat blog and has been working tirelessly to produce interesting and informative articles for UK consumers since the blog's creation. Kelly's passion is travelling. She loves her job because she can do it from anywhere in the world! Whether inspiration hits her while sitting on the balcony of a French B&B, or whether she is struck with an idea in a roadside cafe in Moscow, she will always make sure that the idea comes to fruition. Kelly's insights come from her knowledge gained while completing her degree in Economics and Finance as well as from the people she meets around the world. Her motto is: Everyone you meet has something valuable to teach you, so meet as many people as you can!
Blog disclaimer

We do all we can to bring you interesting, practical and valuable information. However, please understand the following:

Information and data on this blog are for information purposes only. While we work hard to ensure it is accurate, we cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, suitability or validity of any information provided on the blog. We will not be liable for any errors, omissions, losses, injuries or damages arising from its display or use. All information is provided with no warranties and confers no rights.

If you feel that any of the information published on our blog is not accurate, please notify us via email at

Cashfloat is rated 4.82 stars by based on 601 merchant reviews

4.82 / 5 Rating
601 Reviews
Thank you cash flow very quick and easy application very helpful staff no hassle
Miss J
This has been very helpful to me and my family thank you
Zero hassle accepted me with bad credit file got me out of a right financial muddle thank you so much
Bottom content

Cashfloat is a trading style of Western Circle Limited - Company Registration Number: 7581337. We are fully authorised and regulated by The Financial Conduct Authority. FCA full permission license: 714479. ICO Registration Number: Z3305234

* Cashfloat terms and conditions apply. Applicants must be 18 or over. All loans are subject to affordability, applicant verification and traditional credit checks via various national databases by Cashfloat responsible lending policy. In most cases, loan decisions may take up to 30 minutes during office working hours. If your bank does not support Faster Payments, funds will be sent to your account the same day as approval so long as you’re approved by 16:30.

Representative example: Borrow £600 for 4 months, 4 monthly repayments of £247.68. Total repayment £990.71, interest rate p.a. (fixed) 270.10%. RAPR 997%.

Warning: Late repayment can cause you serious money problems. For help, go to

This site uses cookies. Find out more.